Skip to content
Digital Horizons Blog

Ex- Second-in-Command Dick Cheney: A Retrospective on His Impactful Government Service

The former US vice-president Dick Cheney, who died at age 84, was regarded as one of the most powerful holders of that office in the nation's history. Although countless vice-presidents were confined to peripheral or ceremonial functions, Cheney wielded substantial sway during the administration of George W Bush, to such an extent that he was commonly called as the "actual president".

Bush resented that description and stated the connection was more nuanced. He observed that Cheney was deferential, always referring to him in public settings as President, while he called him as Dick. Bush questioned even portrayals of their association as a team because it implied that they were peers. Despite such protestations, Cheney viewed the relaxed president malleable on a wide array of administrative determinations.

A Period Following the Attacks

In charge of a contingent of neo-conservatives that included Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld and deputy defence secretary Paul Wolfowitz, he vigorously promoted the military intervention of Iraq in 2003 in reaction to the 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington. At the time of the 9/11 attack, Bush had been taking part in a gathering at a educational institution in Florida. As Bush traveled to a secret bunker in Nebraska, Cheney took command, commanding the destruction of any unresponsive planes nearing the Capitol building.

Cheney stated the strikes transformed him, causing him to be focused on revenge. Together with other neo-cons, such as Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz, he advocated for a invasion of Afghanistan in an endeavor to seize Osama bin Laden. Cheney then strongly advocated for the military action of Iraq, although there was little proof of Saddam Hussein having involvement.

Controversial Actions

He expressed no regrets about the military campaign, in which an reckoned 100,000 Iraqis perished, and not about the harsh treatment of suspects apprehended after 9/11. He informed CNN in 2015 that the Iraq military action, which was predicated on inaccurate reports circulated by Cheney, was the proper course of action. "It was the correct action to do then. I was convinced at the time and I believe it now."

Yet even at the time, there were opposing views at a senior level about the botched execution of Iraq. One of the White House's own special envoys to the area, General Anthony Zinni (2001-03), was dismissed from the role. "I observed, at a minimum," he subsequently stated "clear negligence, negligence, and irresponsibility: potentially, falsehoods, ineptitude, and corruption."

Broader Context

Cheney was not solely accountable for the Iraq invasion. Even before 9/11, Wolfowitz had advocated for such action. He had written a memo outlining situations in which national priorities might be compromised (featuring "obtaining crucial commodities, primarily Persian Gulf oil"). Wolfowitz had asserted that "the US should be positioned to take unilateral action when joint efforts cannot be orchestrated," specifically mentioning armed actions against Iraq.

Bush additionally had arrived in the Oval Office generally inclined on executing what his parent had famously refused to do in 1991; topple Saddam. Subsequent to he had been dismissed by the administration, the treasury secretary Paul O'Neill recounted how, at the opening session of the National Security Council in January 2001, Bush had stated his objective of reducing America's involvement in the Middle East dispute and mooted military action against Iraq.

Bush held a personal grudge against Saddam, believing he had been behind a conspiracy to murder his father, President George HW Bush, on a visit to Kuwait in 1993. He also objected to that one of the largest hotels in Baghdad had a ground design with a image of his predecessor's face that everyone had to tread upon.

Investigation Approaches

Yet it was Cheney who was one of the most vociferous behind striking Iraq, consistently referencing agency briefings that were either weak or entirely misleading. He supported what the Bush government indirectly described as "enhanced interrogation", the use of interrogation method and harsh treatment.

Responding to a Senate analysis in 2014 that determined that no valuable data had resulted from the harsh techniques, Cheney dismissed the findings as "riddled with crap". He told Fox News: "We requested [the CIA] to take steps and put in place initiatives to catch the bastards who murdered 3,000 of us on 9/11 and guarantee it was not repeated. That's exactly what they did and they earn a lot of praise."

External Perception

Cheney took pleasure in labels imposed on him by detractors such as Darth Vader and The Prince of Darkness, and by the notion that he was a shadow power directing Bush. In the author's 2013 publication about the two, Days of Fire: Bush and Cheney in the White House, Cheney is reported as stating: "Is it me who is the sinister strategist in the background that operates invisibly come out of his lair? This represents a advantageous way to work, in fact."

Corporate Connections

Controversy over his business interests accompanied him throughout his time as vice-president. While he had minimal expertise in commerce but good contacts in security, particularly in Saudi Arabia, he was invited to join Halliburton, one of the world's biggest energy corporations, in 1995 as chair and chief executive.

In 2000 he assumed the role of Bush's VP candidate for the executive branch. Contentiously, during the military campaign, Halliburton was awarded US agreements totaling substantial sums.

It greatly increased his wealth. His yearly earnings during his tenure at the company increased from his $258,394 while defence secretary to over four million. When he resigned in 2000 he had a compensation package valued at over $20m|twenty

The writer

Mark Soto

A digital strategist and tech writer with over a decade of experience in emerging technologies and innovation ecosystems.

Digital Horizons Blog

Type to search articles.